Schools today are responsible for meeting the educational
needs of an increasingly diverse student population. The Reauthorization of the Elementary and
Secondary Education Act (ESEA) 2009 (No Child Left Behind (NCLB) 2001 goal of
improving academic achievement of all groups of students, including low-income
and minority, English Learners, and students with disabilities. The new focus is on ensuring that all
students are learning what they need to succeed and be prepared to transition
from high school into college or career ready.
The new ESEA calls for:
Ø
Raising standards for all students in English
language arts and mathematics;
Ø
Developing better assessments aligned with college-
and career-ready standards; and
Ø
Implementing a complete education through
improved professional development and evidence-based instructional models and
supports.
Students need a well-rounded education to contribute as
citizens in our society. Teachers and
school districts need to share the responsibility in ensuring all children
receive a complete education. The whole
child has to be developed. It will take
a team effort with specific goals of collaboration to achieve success. Special Education and all other services, supports
and aids are an undeniable necessity. All of which have a shared responsibility
including regular education and special school programs in meeting the needs of
all children including those with exceptionalities.
The Council for Exceptional Children (CEC) believes “The
developmental, academic, and lifelong success of the nation’s 7 million
children and youth with disabilities relies on innovative research and
development. To implement the ESEA/NCLB,
educators are required by law to utilize scientifically based strategies and
interventions.” (CEC 2012)
The general education classroom is the place in which the
general education curriculum (College and Career Standards CCSS at all levels
K-12) is most likely to be taught to students with disabilities. 96 percent of all classrooms are inclusive
today. Effective instruction begins when
educators create learning environments in which students learn to respect and
value each other and everyone’s individual differences, understand their roles
and responsibilities, work in self-directed manner and participate in setting
classroom rules. Teachers create an effective learning community by discovering
the abilities of all the students, developing systematic ways to collect
information on student progress for use in planning future lessons and using
collaborative teaching grouping, and differentiated instructional strategies to
individualize student education experiences.
There are three research based, proven school wide
strategies that could be implemented at any school level that targets and
provides intervention for all students at all levels.
Universal Design for Learning (UDL) is the first strategy
that is used in the general education curriculum to ensure all students can
access academic content information. UDL
provides a blueprint for creating instructional goals, methods, materials, and
assessments that work for everyone, not a single, one-size-fits-all solution
but rather flexible approaches that can be customized and adjusted for
individual needs. There are three
elements of UDL. First, multiple means
of representation, which relates to the materials the teachers use to represent
the content they are asking their students to learn. Second, multiple means of action and expression,
concerns how the materials provide alternative ways for student to demonstrate
knowledge. Third, multiple means of
engagement, deals with how the materials take advantage of student interests
and motivation to engage them in learning.
The second strategy for intervention is Response to Intervention
(RTI). RTI is a means to determine whether
any student, regardless of type of disability, needs more intensive
instruction. RTI is a multilayered
system for struggling learners that provide increasingly intense levels of
academic interventions and assessment.
CEC’s stance on RTI as a school-wide initiative, with special education
as an explicit part of the framework, spanning both general and special
education in collaboration with families.
The RTI process represents an inclusive partnership between all school
personnel and families to identify and address the academic and behavioral
needs of learners beginning as early as the preschool years. (CEC 2011) RTI is a multi-tiered approach that may
reduce the numbers of students referred for special education. RTI promotes effective early intervention,
provides diagnostic information to consider in the identification of a disability,
and may reduce the impact of a disability on a child’s academic progress.
Positive Behavior Support (PBS) is the third strategy. Schools actually are required to have school-wide
Positive Behavior System in place. PBS
is a systems-level, problem solving, data-based approach to reducing problem
behavior, improving appropriate behavior and achieving important academic,
social and communication outcomes for a particular student and for all students,
throughout the school building. Teachers
instruct students to replace their problem behavior with appropriate behavior,
enabling them to benefit much more effectively from the general curriculum.
All three of these strategies work and require very little
cost. Even if schools are not utilizing
them school wide, individual teachers can implement them within their
classroom. I use all three. I am able to get some support for RTI from
our Intervention Specialist Administrator at my building. There is an overwhelming amount of resources available
through the internet to provide supports for implementing UDL, RTI and
PBS. Intervention Central is a favorite
of mine, that I often refer colleagues and parents to.
Karen,
ReplyDeleteThank you for expanding my knowledge of what programs are out there in support of Early Intervention. Believe it or not, these programs are new to me. My "plan," in terms of what I try to do for my students, is not supported in any other way than "keep up the good work." I fall back on best practices for student-centered learning, as I have learned them myself in the classes I have taken in pursuit of my M.Ed. I may have heard of UDL in passing, but PBS, not at all...
This is what I mean - teachers need to have not only the knowledge of what is out there in terms of programs to help our students, they also need the support from administration and time to learn. Otherwise, all that happens is a "flavor of the month" approach to strategies, which don't necessarily help students in the long run.
I look forward to exploring the programs you outlined here, and plan to work to incorporate them in a more permanent way in my own classroom. Thank you for sharing!
Ray
Karen,
ReplyDeleteI enjoyed the ideas you proposed for early intervention programs that teachers can use. I love how you stated the strategies you proposed did not have to be school wide, but an individual teacher could take the idea and run with it. The internet is such a valuable tool that can help a teacher implement their own early intervention programs. It is refreshing to a see a teacher take charge and implement their own strategies regardless of what is occurring in the classrooms around them! Stellar Work!
Karen, I have used PBS and RTI in the classroom. You are right, they are very easy to implement. The internet has a wealth of ideas to share and its an easy way to network with other teachers who have had experiencing in using the intervention strategies.
ReplyDelete