Sunday, November 24, 2013

BLOG 7B (Kelly Semple)
A perspective on:  The Concept of Least Restrictive Environment by, Nicole Yozzwiak

          I was just curious if reading these types concepts get easier when you teach?  I understand but is it innate – knowing the concepts and laws or is it impractical for teachers to interact with student and see were the concepts fit?

            It almost seems as if excessive to take an idea mainstreaming and tweak it, call it something else inclusion principle and tweak it again and call it Least Restrictive Environment (LRE).  I keep thinking I am missing the idea. "A rose by any other name would smell as sweet", what matters is what something is, not what it is called and this seems to be where I get hung up.   Am I getting too hung up on the names and missing the concepts?  Since I don’t teach it is really hard for me to answer this question and no matter how much I study LRE is still mainstreaming, because that is how I was initially taught the concept.   Of course over time anything will evolve that is nature so why does it have to be renamed or is it that much of a difference?  Teachers where the same 20 or so years ago, they wanted to teach and usually always had the students best interest at heart.   

            The Idea of where can individuals can be placed, now that concept has evolved immensely. The longevity of people of course has extended and with that comes the concept “now what”, so there was a push to reevaluate how to educate and what works best for the whole.   

            Finally, I wanted to briefly address the thought of inclusion and how it benefits “typical students”.  I know for a fact that teenagers typical or not, are teenagers and when you combine them there are benefits but there are also setbacks.  It is not uncommon to have a disabled teenager to develop an interest in a typical teenager it just seems more difficult trying to explain to a disabled teenager why the prom queen doesn’t like him or vice a verse. Also, the older I get it seems unrealistic to see the glass half full; most individuals are products of genetics.  It takes an extraordinary teacher to teach humility and compassion.

            Information presented was abundant and helpful.  Transitioning from topic to topic was effortless.  Hopefully, the information will become second nature.

No comments:

Post a Comment