After
reading the chapters in the text book and assignments in Module 3, I felt very
confused. So then I thought I would read
some blog posting from the teachers in the class, there were only two postings. My third attempt was to actually look up the
definition of inclusion; it basically states it was more about the "basic
rights of disabled students". The
right to a free public education, to the best of society’s abilities. That was not very encouraging. The actuality is that this is the definition
of utopia (at least an educational utopia).
Education for an individual according
to their needs! Our text book states
that inclusion is not required if the student will not benefit from being
placed in general education but so many of the successful stories given are
about how the disabled student does
nothing but benefits from inclusion.
I believe that the system can work;
I just haven't seen it too often. I read Sandra Zeman’s blog about how the
school where she teaches implements an early childhood inclusive program, I
feel that it is much easier to teach a young child acceptance and limitations
then it is to expect them to adapt midstream.
I believe this situation of early childhood inclusion is utopia. In the text book it lists examples of many
school systems that seem to excel in the inclusive programs but it seems the
geographic location is much different than ours. Most school appeared to be in California,
which I believe has a great deal to do with the system working. The community has a major influence in the way
education is presented, California is very liberal. I also feel that family, the school, and the
way they interact play major roles in the success of inclusion.
As a whole I do not believe that
inclusion is very successful unless all the stars align. With the current
changes in academic requirements for teachers and students, it seems inclusion
will only suffer more. The idea of
perfect education for me was to be able to show a student how it works, I
believe in group learning, visual and not audio learning, early childhood fun
education and most important exposure; what better way to actually learn
something but to see, hear, taste or feel it.
With such a different opinion I thought I would ask the masses, people I
work with-all around skilled labor to higher educated individuals the responses
were amazing: 1. White female fiftyish
thought it would be a good experience for the normal kids to see the disabled
children aren’t so scary. 2. White male
grown children had his daughter graduate with a brain injured student, the disabled
student graduated tenth in the class (with a lot of extra help) and his daughter
graduated eleventh. 3. The same man in
#2 had a nephew who was completely deaf and attended public school they placed
him in a resource room in the basement and none of the teachers signed. 4. Younger white male in rural school system
his youngest goes to school with a sixth grade boy with autism, the boy has
multiple outbursts and disrupts the class.
5. The last a black male, public
city schools, bi-racial marriage and five children had very strong family,
church and community values, faith based system. The
push in education definitely seems to side with inclusion, I just don’t know if
our system or our community has evolved to accommodate.
I can totally relate to the confusion and have felt that way many times. I think that in my career I have seen both the positives and the negatives. I think that with mandates and laws we paint what it best for students with a broad brush and we stop focusing on the student as having individual needs. I think we at times do not want to hurt parents or children in the decision making process. We don't want to continue to give them a list of things that they can not do. This debate will continue because we can't choose on option and say that it will work for all students. I loved your final line about an evolution in our system and community that needs to happen and I could not agree more. I think that minds need to be opened about accepting differences as well as conversations about what is best for a student may not always be the path of the norm. Both are very rich ideas that can cause uncomfortable feeling and emotions.
ReplyDeleteI totally enjoyed your reference to inclusion as an educational utopia. I wish the world was like it is described in our text books. I am not totally discouraged though. I subbed while my children were young and although I saw many horrible teachers, I've also seen a lot of fantastic ones. I have seen inclusion work many times but I truly believe it depends on the teacher. As I have stated in previous comments, many times teachers are given an almost impossible task of reaching a large, diverse group of children and left to figure it out by themselves. The resistance expressed about inclusion is not about not wanting these children in our classrooms its about not having the necessary support to do it right.
ReplyDeleteKelly I too was confused and had difficulty deciding if inclusion really is the best placement for an ELN student and the other students. You did a nice job of formulating a well educated response by researching and using real world situations to form your opinion. The Pros and Cons both have their points and support them well. I think for us we have to continue to get educated and gain more knowledge about how as professionals we can have the greatest influence on educating and servicing ELN students while meeting their individual needs. Hopefully we will be able to share it with others and make a difference for them as well.
ReplyDelete