Disproportionate representation is a consistent problem that could easily be resolved with appropriate evaluations, viewing students with a non-biased state of mind, and considering all factors in regard to a student's characteristics. In my opinion, from the field experiences that I have encountered so far, inappropriate placements and misclassification seems to have improved over the years. Within our reading, I have gained knowledge on how far disproportionate representation has come in special education throughout the years. I do feel that we have come a long way from one of the most important court cases in history, Brown v. Board of Education. Students are no longer segregated due to their racial and ethnic minorities. Nor are students only placed into the special education program relying solely on their disproportion from other school-age peers. According to Education for All: Critical Issues in the Education of Children and Youth with Disabilities, weaknesses were surprisingly found in the research regarding biases. From the reading, I learned that though biases may be a factor that can be considered with overrepresentation it is not the overall underlying cause of the situation. (Jimenez & Graf, 2008)
In my perspective, one solution to overcoming disproportionate representation is that when you encounter a student who is displaying unexplainable characteristics you keep a non-biased state of mind and acquire for them the appropriate evaluations. As an educator who works with students with disabilities on a daily basis, it can be tough to refrain from quickly labeling them according to my knowledge. For example, recently I have been providing services to a Kindergarten student who is not yet diagnosed. He is displaying characteristics that include running around the classroom, asking the same question even though answered multiple times, showing obsession about certain topics, and an academic level and knowledge that is substantially lower than his school age peers. He is currently in the referral process, but is often misclassified during professional discussion as being emotionally disturbed. He has yet to have completed a ETR; however, due to his characteristics, he already has a label. I agree with Jennifer in the aspect that most of our inappropriate placing and misclassification in today's society is arising from students who are not yet diagnosed and beginning their school journey. This brings me into my second solution to overcome disproportionate representation. In regard to my students that I have worked with, I find it vital to consider all characteristics and view the whole picture before making any judgements. Though the student from my example is displaying the factors mentioned above, one must consider and question if there are underlying causes to his characteristics such as; home life, medical issues, or even a lack of attention. I believe if we work to eliminate biases against students of different races and ethnicities, get the students their appropriate evaluations, and consider all characteristics of a child, then we can continue to overcome this issue in education.
Another problem within the overrepresentation of our students is that so often students are pushed directly into the special education program without the use of a great system: RTI. As noted in our reading, "RTI models provide an alternative way of conceptualizing how we support student learning." Sadly, a lot of teachers just don't want to be bothered with exceptional students and that is where overrepresentation becomes a factor, but with the use of RTI models they can reduce the amount of inappropriate placements. (Jimenez & Graf, 2008)
Overall, our attention needs to be less focused on the identification and labeling of disabilities, and more on what these students need to receive a beneficial and thriving education.
Alexa I agree that we are quick to label students based on our limited working knowledge. I find this is something I struggle with professonially. I work with children with Autism, but since no two children are alike, I am constantly surprised how unique each child is once we get to know them personally and get past the disability. I also agree RTI is a step in the right direction in helping the disproportion reprasantation of students.
ReplyDeleteYou experience with a student going through the referral process is very interesting. It is too bad that some teachers are so quick to attach a label to a student without having the proper evidence to back up their claims. I also agree with you that many outside factors can have an adverse affect on the behaviors of some students.
ReplyDeleteAlexa, I too agree with you in that our attention needs to be less focused on labeling students' with disabilities and more on student needs. I enjoyed reading about your experience with your current kindergarten student and related to your statement in which you described that is it difficult for you to "refrain from quickly labeling [students] according to [your] knowledge. I often find myself in the same situation. I believe educators are sometimes too quick to label students, including myself, which is an unfortunate result in disproportionate representation. I also agree with your perspective on RTI. As a previous RTI tutor, I saw firsthand the amount of students who could have benefited from this resource, but were not incorporated.
ReplyDeleteI agree that we should focus more on student needs. I have seen to many students get labeled by teachers without them taking the time to actually sit down and figure out what the student needs before jumping to labeling. When this happens, we have disproportionate labeling and a disservice to our students as well as many special education teachers. These teachers could have lower numbers within their caseload and be able to put more of a focus on what students need who truly do have a disability instead of being burdened with high caseloads with students that just need some extra classroom accommodations or modifications to succeed.
ReplyDelete