Disproportionate
representation in special education has been an ongoing issue and continues to
be a consistent problem. The
disproportionately high representation of racial and ethnic minorities as well
as culturally and linguistically diverse students in special education
classrooms has been a problem for more than thirty-five years. This has been particularly acute for select
groups (African American and Latino) and in select categories (mild mental
retardation, learning disabilities, emotional disturbances, speech, and
language). Unfortunately, this debate
over disproportionate representation, inappropriate placement, and
misclassification of minority pupils is far from being resolved (Jimenez &
Graf 2008).
Culturally
responsive instructional practices can offer the promise of providing
opportunities to learn for culturally and linguistically diverse students and
reduce disproportionate representation.
Wiley (1996) provides useful framework educators can use to implement
culturally responsive instructional practices.
Accommodation is one type of practice that refers to the need for
educators, administration, and other school personnel to understand the
cultural norms, communication styles, and literacy practices of their students
to help adapt their instruction accordingly.
The second to type of practice is incorporation, taking accommodation
one step further requiring researchers and educators inn understanding diverse
cultures that also acknowledge certain community practices that have not been valued
previously by the schools and what can be learned from other ethnic
groups. The third type of practice that
can be used is adaptation. This relates
to how the adults and children can
acculturate to the norms of those who control the school, institutions, or
workplace (Wiley 1996). In doing so, the school has a responsibility to give
parents information and support that is needed to help the children with the
new forms of culture to adapt to. In
combination, these 3 types of practice can provide a framework to implement
working toward educational equity for diverse students and culturally
responsive teaching. Response to
intervention models has been an important implication to the principle of cultural responsiveness (Jimenez & Graf
2008).
In my
opinion, it is most important to find out the needs of the student
academically. Rather, society tends to
label someone based on their culture or ethnicity instead of taking the time to reach a student and get to
know them individually. I strongly
agree with the culturally responsive instructional practices as mentioned
above. Stated in the three types of
practices, research suggests that it is possible to design and implement
culturally responsive interventions that enhance learning for diverse
populations . I also believe that
offering the promise of providing an opportunity to learn for culturally and
linguistically diverse students reduces disproportionate representation
(Jimenez & Graf, 2008).
True, offering the 'promise' of opportunity is essential; however, the circumstances of disproportions demand that the entire foundation of education be given attention. This can be accomplished on several methods. First, assessments must be given further weight so only quantitative data will be used, and random placements will be eliminated. Second, we must retrain our staff to respond to the ever-changing dynamics of society. By adopting this cultural approach, the educational message can become far more potent.
ReplyDelete