Pages

Wednesday, October 14, 2015

Blog Post #4: Disproportionate Representation in Special Education


The overrepresentation of culturally and linguistically diverse students is a huge problem in special education.  While it is important for all students to get the education they deserve, it is unfair to inaccurately place students in special education programs if they don’t need it.  As stated in Education for All, “the overrepresentation of students of color means that they have limited access to general education experiences and the opportunities those experiences provide” (Jimenez & Graf, 2008, p. 132)
The misidentification of special education students seems to be one aspect of the problem.  After talking to a number of teachers (both general education and special education), the major consensus is that both parents and teachers are too quick to label students as special needs.  Some students just do not get good grades, and are placed in the special education program. 
While talking to a few teachers in the Austintown School District, there seems to be an overwhelming agreement that the students are mislabeled.  Austintown is one of the larger school districts in the area, and the special education program is very culturally disproportionate.  While I am not a teacher, it was very helpful talking to these teachers and getting their opinions.  They believe that some students are labeled as special needs, but they just do not apply themselves.  One example I heard, was a family asking for their child to be placed in the special education program because he was not getting good grades.  He was tested, and it was determined that he did not have a learning disability, but his mother was insistent of his placement in special education. 
I am not yet a teacher, but this is disappointing to hear that some families request unnecessary placement of their child in special education.   They believe that their child will receive specialized instruction; however, he or she is missing out of the opportunities provided in the general education curriculum.
I believe that one solution is more parent involvement.  If students can feel comfortable going to their parents for academic help, then they tend to do better in school.  They get the attention and extra assistance they need at home, and that translates in the classroom.  A good home life can help students perform better in class.  Focused attention from parents can give the student more confidence in school when asked to participate.  He or she will be better prepared going into the next school day.  This can lead to better grades, and not be inaccurately identified.

While I understand that this is easier said than done, I believe that there must be some way for students to get extra help.  I know that some students come from a very unhealthy home, and extra parent involvement is unlikely.  However, as teachers, we must evaluate a child properly, and not just immediately place him or her in special education.  Some students might benefit from a tutor, or an extra study hall.  The answer isn’t always to label them as special education.  

4 comments:

  1. Abby, I agree that we should not label someone as special ed when maybe they just need some extra help, and need parents who take an active role in their life. I am not a teacher in the classroom but one of my good friends is an intervention specialist at Boardman. They use the response to intervention approach. They will evaluate student's progress to determine how much support they need. The benefit of this approach is that the extra help is offered to all students who require it in the general classroom. This greatly reduces the amount of students who need special ed services. She said that occasionally the students who normally don't need additional help will raise their hand that they need extra help. She says this approach helps decrease the amount of labeling.

    ReplyDelete
  2. That is unfortunate that a child is being mislabeled because he/she is not catching on right away. As an educator it is our job to meet the needs of ALL students. We should not need an IEP or a ' label' to accommodate lessons/ materials for children. Just because a child is struggling with a lesson or concept does not mean they are 'special education'. It means the current approach of teaching is simply not working for that child and it is the educators' duty to find an approach that will work for EVERY student.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Great post, Abby! I completely agree with you about the family piece needing to improve. I wrote about that as well in my post. As you stated though, it is incredibly challenging to fix such a broken mess. So many children are not only being disproportionately represented, but grossly neglected! Plain and simple! These kids don't need an IEP, they need a DAD!

    ReplyDelete
  4. I think sometimes parents are over involved at times.. reading too much into symptoms and assuming the worst and having their child be misdiagnosed.

    ReplyDelete